This is a static archive scraped from the now-closed superduke.net forum. If this archive has helped you at all and you fancy buying me a pint to say thanks, you can do so at buymeacoffee.com.

Have any of you dudes heard of this engine

AGRO!

AGRO!

2015-03-02 10:19:00 UTC

http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=c19kn3drdFU

lc4

lc4

2015-03-02 10:33:00 UTC

Post missing.

SDNerd

SDNerd

2015-03-02 14:47:00 UTC

Post missing.

AGRO!

AGRO!

2015-03-02 22:49:00 UTC

Post missing.

xrpilot

xrpilot

2015-03-03 02:19:00 UTC

Post missing.

AGRO!

AGRO!

2015-03-03 07:02:00 UTC

Post missing.

scamb66

scamb66

2015-03-03 09:06:00 UTC

Undoubtably go the way of the Rotary, Orbital, V-Due, Stirling and steam engines (plus countless others), despite what the manufacturer claims.

shadowman

shadowman

2015-03-03 09:21:00 UTC

Interesting and not one I had seen before.

Main stated benefits seem to be the reduction in rotating mass (reciprocater V conventional crankshaft) the ability to run higher compression ratios without valves in the combustion chamber and a big reduction in the parts count so presumably lower manufacturing / service costs.

I'm guessing that set against would be the cost / complexity of manufacturing the reciprocator component. As it's basically a rearrangement of the reciprocating piston powered combustion designs we are all familiar with it probably has a higher chance of success than the complete rethinks like the Wankel engine.

Personally I think the true future engine will be the electric motor as it has so many advantages over oil burning. All depends if energy density in batteries can ever be raised to a realistically practical level.

DribbleDuke

DribbleDuke

2015-03-03 14:53:00 UTC

Post missing.