joey120373
2011-08-18 10:10:00 UTC
http://www.advrider.com/forums/showthre ... 225&page=2
This guy is using a stock 990 crank, and 105mm pistons (4mm or ~.160) to gain almost 100cc's over standard 990.
Has anyone done anything like this to an SD-SDR?
I will try to get a hold of the guy to find out how its done, weather some company offers a big bore kit, or if he had the stock jugs sleeved, but would like to see if anyone here has tried it.
I am kicking around the idea of tearing onto the top end of my 07 SD this winter, if this is a somewhat easy mod i may try it.
990 WFO
2011-08-18 12:21:00 UTC
tripoddave
2011-08-18 19:39:00 UTC
In conjunction with their cams, gas flowing and skimming they are guaranteeing an increase of at least 15bhp over an airboxed and akra evo motor
They are (apparently) getting a real rear wheel figure of 145 - 150bhp out of their grass track motors.
This is what I am doing this winter.
I understand that getting much of a bore increase is difficult as the stock liners are not generous so a big bore would include removal of the liner, boring out, fitting of an over sized liner and then reboring.
990 WFO
2011-08-18 21:02:00 UTC
MADDOG53
2011-08-18 21:10:00 UTC
http://www.2rteam.fr/2RTeam/2RTeam.uk_f ... erduke.pdf
joey120373
2011-08-19 03:23:00 UTC
Post missing.
joey120373
2011-08-19 04:38:00 UTC
joey120373
2011-08-19 05:00:00 UTC
joey120373
2011-08-19 18:20:00 UTC
MADDOG53
2011-08-19 21:36:00 UTC
TLS_Russ
2011-08-20 01:08:00 UTC
Post missing.
tripoddave
2011-08-20 06:38:00 UTC
Up to that you should be pretty safe.
I know that there are grass track motors with stock LC8 bottom ends making 150+ at the rear wheel but that is for short periods of time.
TLS_Russ
2011-08-20 06:51:00 UTC
Post missing.
tripoddave
2011-08-20 07:37:00 UTC
Post missing.
TLS_Russ
2011-08-20 09:30:00 UTC
tripoddave
2011-08-20 09:39:00 UTC
Post missing.
TLS_Russ
2011-08-20 13:43:00 UTC
Post missing.
joey120373
2011-08-22 18:03:00 UTC
As for the higher compression pistons requiring better rods requiring race fuel etc etc etc, I hear this argument a lot, and although it has merit, I think its a bit over reactive when it comes to these motors(most modern cycle motors).
The crank, rod and piston are high quality, and usually very strong, if the motor was built at the factory such that a 10-15% increase in power would cause a failure then it would almost certainly never pass initial testing for durability.
Putting 10-15% more pressure on top of the piston has very little effect on internal parts, as the piston and rod have very high compressive strength. Most mechanical failures of rods/pistons/crank actually happen on the intake stroke, when the crank and rod have to decelerate the piston and then pull it back down.So spinning a motor faster stresses the components way more than putting more pressure on top of the piston.
The new RC8R has 13.5/1 CR, the SD has 11.5/1, granted the RC8R has dual plugs and a firing scheme to deal with the high CR, a lot of factory cars are coming out with 12+/1 CR, so i think there is room to improve the SD there as well.
as for the twisting case and stretching bolts, i need to go research that. If there is an issue, i would hope the KTM, being self proclaimed highest quality in the industry, would do something to remidy the situation.
SDNerd
2011-08-22 22:52:00 UTC
It can't possibly be worth the cost, and for a road-going bike, unless you live in a country where you can run it flat out AND you get a buzz from that, 140+ bhp naked bike, kinda pointless. If I wanted that, I'd just buy a Streetfighter, Tuono, or B_King. Wait, did I just type that?
No matter what, the longevity/reliability will be reduced. If nothing else (other than mere strength of materials), heat will be the enemy.
If its gotta be orange, buy an RC8(R), and strip it.
MADDOG53
2011-08-23 22:12:00 UTC
Post missing.
TLS_Russ
2011-08-24 05:05:00 UTC
joey120373
2011-08-24 15:10:00 UTC
Post missing.
TLS_Russ
2011-08-24 15:34:00 UTC
Then you have the SD base gasket leakage problem which appears to be caused by the barrel studs stretching and crankcase flexing which is only going to be more of a problem with a higher compression ratio, if you also increase the bore size reducing the amount of metal in the barrel wall and fitting a larger heavier piston,
Well I think it will be a case of not will it go bang but when, probably during the dyno runs to set it up
BASH69
2011-08-24 16:11:00 UTC
joey120373
2011-08-24 17:31:00 UTC
Post missing.
TLS_Russ
2011-08-25 07:42:00 UTC
joey120373
2011-08-30 20:51:00 UTC
Post missing.
joey120373
2011-08-30 21:52:00 UTC
Post missing.
SDNerd
2011-08-30 22:12:00 UTC
Ok, i'm being a bit ridiculous, but just to illustrate the point, guys pay $1500-$2000 every day to get 10 more rear HP, and are quite happy they did, are they overheating......not heard that one yet.
The mods I am considering could be done inside that same budget, albeit more time consuming, and could easily gain another 10HP, and more torque, my question is "why not?"
the answers to that are being discussed at length in this thread,biggest "why not" in my mind right now is mainly unknown engine reliability.
and as far as heat is concerned, IMHO that is way down on the list, think about it, how often in normal,even "spirited" riding are you at full throttle for extended amounts of time? its usually on-off-on-off- throttle. If a stock SD cooling system can stand a full day at the track where average speeds are much higher than daily driving, and for longer periods, then adding 5-10% more heat into the system will not cause an issue under normal everyday hooliganism.
joey120373
2011-08-30 22:42:00 UTC
Post missing.
TLS_Russ
2011-08-31 14:05:00 UTC
Post missing.
SDNerd
2011-08-31 14:51:00 UTC