Hi guys i'm hoping one of you can help me out a little regarding my 2008 SDR dyno results. Basically what i want is for somebody to have a look at the readings here and tell me what is going on with the curves and are they within respectable limits, etc. And if there is something i should be questioning the chaps who did the tune/dyno. The bike is an 08 SDR with all the usual mods like custom air filter plate and filter, secondarys removed, Akras and a tune to suit. All of the custom work including the mapping were done before i purchased the bike. Thanks in advance guys, as an electrician i make a shitty bike mechanic!
[img][/img]

Power is not too bad, pretty much ball park for a tuned SDR I believe.

Could be a bit smoother, I guess from running a bit rich still.
How did they do the tune? Just loaded the Akra map, used and powercommander or loaded it with tuneecu?

Honestly i'm not entirely sure how they did it as i left the bike with them for a few weeks as i work in Gladstone but live in brisbane. I had a service and a few things done aswell and i asked them to dyno it and smooth out the lurching throttle for me and make sure everything is ok. So as far as i know he changed the mix settings where it was needed. It was pretty horrible at low/constant speeds but now it's a lot smoother in the ranges where i guess he richened things up a little.

Nah no Power Commander fitted. Fuel wise it's actually been fairly normal since then i believe. No real obvious fuel smells anyway otherwise i would've noticed over the last few days.

Appreciate your input KTM GUY, cheers.

My 05 SD990 was also tuned and tested on dynojet.

It has: removed flies and sas, moto hooligan airbox, rc8 trumpets and tune ecu custum map





The scale is a lot different to compare the lines but:

- HP don't seem too bad and torque is quite near as well ( 100 nm is around 73 ft lbs ) but drops quite quickly, I have almost 4000rpm over 73 ft lbs...
- your x over point of torque vs HP is quite higher

I'm sure the Tuneecu thread can have a lot of useful info ( including some reports from similar year SD to direct comparing )

One day you will probably need those electrician skills on your bike haha

Here is my dyno sheet if you want to compare, I have the same mods but with yoshi's. custom made map using just tune ecu.

They do a bloody good job at Procycle Dyno. Smooth as a baby's arse afterwards
here's my printout

Sorry i haven't replied guys but i have been working away and stupidly made the mistake of not taking my laptop with me. I do appreciate the input and the printouts to compare mine with. I guess i shouldn't really be concerned about how it looks as it is riding and behaving really well. I was thinking that the max torque could be higher and maybe not so abrupt on the curve. Maybe it has been richened up a little too much?

My figures are 120.57 BHP and 75.77 Ft/lb Torque - both figures measured at the wheel of course and the torque comes in just over 60Ft/lb at 3,500rpm so it's a really flat curve / smooth ride.

Bike was too lean to manage a full run with standard ECU mapping, Rottweiler and SAS blocked (not that the SAS contributed at this point) so if you're doing the same be warned.

I fitted the RC8 progressive throttle and the KTM ECU was re-mapped on a dyno so the air/fuel is between 15 AFR to 12 AFR across the rev range. The KTM ECU doesn't allow a map per gear so high revs in 5th/6th mean that it's nearer 15AFR in the lower/mid rev range to allow a non lean setting at the top of around 12AFR.

Bike now has 17:38 gearing to make the most of the smooth linear torque and rides superbly.

Peak BHP could be increased to 125/127ish with Akra' headers but that would loose a bit of torque, so I'll keep it like this until I move to the 1290..

here is my SD 05 dyno run
moto box, sas out, akra spilp on