TLS_Russ
2011-07-17 14:25:00 UTC
The increase or decrease of torque when you change the sprockets on a chain-driven motorcycle engine can be calculated with a bit of a basic math.You can quickly determine on paper whether a desired sprocket change will improve the torque and the bike's performance or make it worse. Figuring this result mathematically beforehand can save wasted time and help prevent unnecessary mechanical work if the wrong sprocket sizes are used.
Count the teeth on the front sprocket. Do the same for the rear sprocket, Write this data down, then divide the tooth count of the smaller, front sprocket into the tooth count of the larger, rear sprocket using a calculator (for example, a 17-tooth front sprocket with a 47-tooth rear sprocket will be 47/17, or 2.76 when rounded. Write down the result as the existing drive ratio). Perform the same tooth-counting process in Step 1 with the two new sprockets that you plan to swap out and use in the modified chain drive setup. Calculate the new drive ratio using the same formula. Write this ratio down on the notepad (for example, the new set of 19 front teeth and 50 rear teeth would be 50/19, or 2.63).
Subtract the new drive ratio from the old sprocket setup drive ratio (in our example 2.63 less 2.76 equals -0.13). Divide this mathematical difference (in our case a negative value) by the original drive ratio value (-0.13/2.76 equals -0.047). Multiply the decimal result by 100 to obtain the percentage change in torque between the two setups (for example, -0.047 by 100 equals -4.7 percent, which represents a loss of torque from the original setup).
That is the loss of torque from the chain and sprockets transmitted to the back wheel not the percentage lost of the dyno measurement taken at the rear tyre.
Another interesting point is that a well maintained chain and sprocket set up can be up to 98% efficient in transmitting output sprocket power to the rear wheel, on most 600-1000cc motorcycles around 70-75mph, but as speed and the chain/sprocket revolutions increase the efficiency drops to around 75% at 140-150mph,
Choosing the wrong sprocket sizes will obviously increase this loss of efficiency further.
interesting stuff
TLS_Russ
2011-07-17 16:51:00 UTC
taking the standard bikes ratio of 17/38 as 0,
17/39 -2.64%
17/40 -5.23%
16/38 -6.27%
16/40 -11.85%
TLS_Russ
2011-07-19 14:47:00 UTC
Bert
2011-07-19 17:31:00 UTC
CEREC1
2011-07-19 18:15:00 UTC
Post missing.
loony888
2011-07-20 08:46:00 UTC
Post missing.
KTM666
2011-07-20 08:53:00 UTC
I have constructed a spread sheet for calculating speed in all gears at all revs that allows you to change gearing and see results
PM with email address and I will forward to you
TLS_Russ
2011-07-20 09:02:00 UTC
I went with 17/40 to as a compromise, larger front sprockets being more efficient and also increased swing arm clearance (the chain dragging on the swing arm guide must loose even more torque
TLS_Russ
2011-07-20 09:06:00 UTC
Post missing.
Hotbrakes
2011-07-21 03:46:00 UTC
Also sticking with the 525 pitch and steel sprockets for longevity. The VTR ate an aluminium 520 rear sprocket in 10k miles, the stockers on the SD are finally bowing out at 20k due to chain degradation.
weeksy
2013-01-22 19:23:00 UTC
TLS_Russ
2013-01-22 19:42:00 UTC
Post missing.
TLS_Russ
2013-01-22 19:53:00 UTC
Post missing.
Viking
2013-01-22 23:49:00 UTC
Post missing.
Jermo
2013-01-23 09:29:00 UTC
Post missing.
turnip
2013-01-23 09:37:00 UTC
Post missing.
The Gin Reaper
2013-01-23 10:25:00 UTC
The swingarm is a lever and youve shortened it slightly which means it will now take more force to compress the spring. Also make sure the forks are completely flush in the yokes and then recheck front preload/sag last as that will have changed too with the weight distribution change.
Very small changes, but depending on your usage make a big difference. Not sure how important it would all be on a road bike but on the race bike it's massive. Also will depend on what kind of rider you are and it your the type to feel changes easily or not.
Your always going to have a compramise as adding a link wont put the exactly wheel back to where it was before.
Colonel_Klinck
2013-01-23 14:18:00 UTC
I didn't do anything with the preload because before the lengthening I had the sag set at the low end of the advised range.
Hotbrakes
2013-01-23 23:01:00 UTC
Post missing.
turnip
2013-04-19 15:28:00 UTC
I wanted to ask you guys for your preference of 16/40T vs 17/41T (I'm assuming that 16/41 is probably more wheelie prone than required). I currently have 16/38T on SD990 '07 and the chain/sprockets need changing.
I read that you can swap the blocks around for the 16/40 setup on the standard chain - thanks @ Gregz.
Do you need a longer chain for 17/41 (I'm guessing you do)? Was thinking of "DID VX 525 x 120" or "DID VX 525 x 118" chain...
Cheers
JohnJJr
2013-04-24 11:37:00 UTC
Post missing.
ozarkhomie
2013-04-25 16:54:00 UTC
Post missing.
JohnJJr
2013-04-25 22:46:00 UTC