cessnatpa
2016-10-27 13:30:00 UTC
For me it's the riding position, growing up I've always owned dirt bikes and dual sports and it feels natural being more upright. Plus I can't get used to being hunched over on long rides. Maybe I'm just getting too old.
https://youtu.be/HMv8pJob3DQ
Aphex
2016-10-27 14:40:00 UTC
RichUK
2016-10-27 14:52:00 UTC
Grew up on dirt bikes and started on an old 77' GS750. Super sports aren't ideal for commuting 90 miles a day when you're 6'4 either, and I've found that I can push it in the canyons just as hard as guys on litre bikes I just get left behind on the freeway at 140mph+.
bic_bicknell
2016-10-27 15:17:00 UTC
DukeNukem999
2016-10-27 20:59:00 UTC
AndyCr15
2016-10-27 21:46:00 UTC
I grew upon bikes in the 1970s that were just bikes - ie. they were naked bikes. We all aspired to the fully-faired racing bikes that our heroes rode in the GPs but very few of us could afford to buy the full-fairing kits available.
Then by the 1990's every super-sports bike that came out of Japan and Italy were all rear-set, clip-ons and full-fairing bikes that made you have to squat, bend your knees and tuck in down the straights (as well as hang off in the corners!) I had a decade of fun on these type of bikes.
By the noughties I was approaching fifty years old and maybe a bit tired of riding flat-out on public roads and trying to recreate my youth all the time. I had realised that some bikes were at least a good as super-sports bikes without all the race-rep stuff and compromised riding that they delivered. I wanted a bike that was as fast and well-handling as the previous Ducatis I'd owned, as practical as the VFR Honda for long distances I'd owned and as mad and indestructible as the KTM Supermotos I'd owned.
Introducing the Superduke!
This is a bike that can be fun and yet all under 100 MPH. Supersport bikes would cost me my license eventually but the naked superbike means that the high speeds are kept lower because of the wind resistance and I rarely go for long over 120mph because it is too hard to hang on. (and my neck and shoulders can take no more, ha ha.)
Best all rounder I've ever imagined was possible. Ten years on I'm still am a fan and am not persuaded to change bikes.
Woody80
2016-10-27 22:59:00 UTC
Pretty much the same view as Bic.. Riding position and less weight leaning forward on my wrists were the main objectives.
My last 4 bikes were a 2006 Blackbird, 2004 VTR1000, 2001 R1 and a 1996 916.
I've had nakeds before inc. a 78 Ducati GTS 860 but most of my bikes before the SD990 were sports or sports / tourers.
So for me it was seating position and the realisation that I rarely go above 120km...and less tempted to go [too] fast is what made me look for a naked.
Stratkat
2016-10-28 05:45:00 UTC
Torque is probably just as big a reason.
Being nimble and allowing me to weave round slow/stationary traffic when commuting is another.
Edorta
2016-10-28 08:32:00 UTC
Ironically since buying the SDR I've only ridden on the roads for about 100 miles in 3 years since the track bug has bitten. Have looked at other naked bikes though as a road bike to encourage a slower pace and with two up options. The SuperDuke didn't really slow my road riding down, I just felt the wind more!!
No. 47
2016-10-28 16:03:00 UTC
Gimlet
2016-10-28 20:59:00 UTC
2 plates n 11 screws in my right knee ended my sport bikes
huskys,ducati,now ktm
love the 1290 R
Sarasota_Steve
2016-10-28 21:24:00 UTC
Scotty
2016-10-28 21:42:00 UTC
Post missing.
SDNerd
2016-10-29 00:20:00 UTC
Post missing.
SDSmurf
2016-10-29 12:23:00 UTC
I only remember my pain in the back and knees (am I too old?
shadowman
2016-10-29 14:41:00 UTC
Gimlet
2016-12-11 13:52:00 UTC
I now think of my Ducati as a sports bike. The riding position is more aggressive and sporty than the SDR but its not as extreme as a true sports bike. Its a perfect compromise. I've had the suspension upgraded with Ohlins and K-tech and it handles like a track weapon but its much more comfortable. The riding position makes moving around on the seat and hanging off the easiest thing in the world and I love the feeling of slenderrness and lack of mass which comes from having no bodywork. Compared to the SDR you sitting on it rather than in it. I can ride it like a sports bike but at road bike speeds. Its been blue-printed and tuned for extra mid-range and bottom end punch. Its not as flat-out fast as a 200 bhp sports bike but its not far off and you don't need to be revving the nuts off it to find prodigious shove. You don't need to be doing 150 mph for it to make sense. It makes a superlative B road scratcher which you can ride all day without needing physiotherapy afterwards.
The SDR is a more comfortable, less sports-focused variation on the theme. They're both roadsters but where the Streetfighter shows its sports bike genes, the SDR has a more supermoto/muscle bike feel. Its an all-rounder. They go together very well without feeling they're duplicating one another.
And then I've got an SMT for everything else..
Scotty
2016-12-12 12:59:00 UTC
Post missing.
shadowman
2016-12-12 15:29:00 UTC
Post missing.